Keywords:-
Article Content:-
Abstract
New problems Modelling is at the heart of mathematical literacy, because many situations that arise in adult life and work cannot be predicted, let alone taught at school. There are now plenty of examples of the successful teaching of modelling at all levels – yet it is to be found in few classrooms. How can every mathematics teacher be brought to teaching modelling reasonably effectively? This paper discusses how progress may be made, illustrating it with examples of „thinking with mathematics” about everyday life problems of concern to most citizens. It discusses the role that curriculum materials, professional development and various kinds of assessment may play, together with the challenges at system level. There are some reasons to be optimistic.
References:-
References
NTPS, Swan, M., Binns, B., Gillespie, J., and Burkhardt, H, with the Shell Centre team (1987-89).
Numeracy Through Problem Solving. Five curriculum and assessment modules. Harlow: Longman,
reissued 2000. Nottingham: Shell Centre Publications
OECD (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem
Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: OECD.
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A.H. (2003). Improving Educational Research: toward a more useful,
more influential and better funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32, 3-14
Burkhardt, H. (2006). From design research to large-scale impact: Engineering research in education. In J.
Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.),
Educational design research. London: Routledge.
Burkhardt, H. with contributions from Pollak, H. O. (2006). Modelling in Mathematics Classrooms:
reflections on past developments and the future. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 39 (2), 178-
Shell Centre, Burkhardt, H., Bell, A., Pead, D., & Swan, M. (2005). Making functional mathematics
happen. Comments to the qualifications and Curriculum Authority Nottingham. Nottingham: Shell
Centre Publications
Shell Centre (1984-86). Problems with Patterns and Numbers and The Language of Functions and Graphs.
Manchester: Joint Matriculation Board, reissued 2000 Nottingham: Shell Centre Publications.
Smith Report. (2004). Making Mathematics Count. London: Department For Education and Skills,
HMSO. Retrieved Nov. 13, 2005, http://www.mathsinquiry.org.uk/report /index.html
Steen, L. A. (Ed). (2002). Mathematics and Democracy: the case for quantitative literacy, the National
Council on Education and the Disciplines (NCED), USA.
Treilibs, V., Burkhardt, H., & Low, B. (1980). Formulation processes in mathematical modelling.
Nottingham: Shell Centre Publications.
Tomlinson Report (2004). 14-19 Curriculum and Qualifications Reform. London: Department For
Education and Skills, HMSO. Retrieved Nov. 13, 2005, http://www.14-19reform .gov.uk/
Swan, M. (2005) Improving Learning in Mathematics. Sheffield: Department for Education and Skills.
(DfES ref: 1599-2005DOC-EN)