Keywords:-
Article Content:-
Abstract
Data is an essential element in research which can be challenging to obtain especially when such data is termed classified. Consequently, researchers depend on dataset or direct collection from respondents. The volume of data collected through this means is grossly limited and laborious putting into consideration, the resources involved in the collection and accuracy rate. In order to ease this, researches that requires demonstration, can rely on internally synthetic generated data. This work looks at how data can be generated using Java multi-dimensional array, and the classification of generated data into cluster using the k-means rectilinear technique, that is used to classify adaptiveness of learners in an eLearning environment. With the combination of simple and complex codes, the work adequately and accurately generated 125 elements, created 5 clusters based on the fusion of known and adopted learning pedagogies, which can be used to determine how learners learn different subject matters.
References:-
References
Ahmed, A. (2018). Teaching and learning vocabulary: insights from learning styles and learning theories. Journal of Child & Adolescent Behaviour, 6(1), 1-4.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323550447
Aktas,I., & Bilgin, I. (2014). The effect of the 4mat learning model on achievement and motivation of 7th grade students on the subject of particulate nature of matter and an examination of students opinions on the model. Research in Science and Technological Education. 33(1), 1-21.
https://www.academia.edu/10347458
Alian, M., & Al-Akharas, M. (2010). Adalearn: an adaptive e-learning environment. ISWSA '10:Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Semantic Web-Services and Applications, 21, 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1874590.1874611
Ambaselker, D., & Bagwan, A. (2016). Adaptive k-means clustering for association rule mining from gene expression data. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research, 5(3), 25-28. https://www.erpublication.org/published_paper/IJETR042111.pdf
Chen, C., Wang, C., Wang, Y., & Wang, P. (2017). Fuzzy logic controller design for intelligent robots. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 27, 1-12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320073463
Dharshinni, N.P., Azmi, F., Fawaz, I., Husein, A.M., & Siregar, S.D. (2019). Analysis of accuracy k-means and apriori algorithms for patient data clusters. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 12(24). https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10367
Dunn, T., & Kennedy, M (2019). Technology enhanced learning in higher education: motivations engagement and academic achievement. Computer and Education, 137(104).
Dziuban, C., Moskal P., Johnson, C., & Evans, D. (2017). Adaptive learning: a tale of two context. Elsevier, 14(1) , 26-55.
https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol4/iss1/3/
Ennouamani, S. (2017). An overview of adaptive e-learning systems. 2017 Eight International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS) Egypt. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322586183
Hawk, T.F., & Shah, A.J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Journal of Innovation Education, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00125.x
Hermanwan, H., Wardani, R., Julian, C., Darmawati, A., & Yarmatov, M. (2018). Adaptive mobile learning in the nearby wisdom app. 2018 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA) Indonesia, 221-225. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333067941
Huang, Q., Yang, D., Jiang, L., Zhang, H., Liu, H., Kotani, K., (2017). An improved k-means algorithm based on association rules. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering 6(2), 146-149. http://www.ijcte.org/papers/853-IT143.pdf.
Irfan, E., David, M., Itans, C., & Wa, J. (2016). Effect of using 4mat method on academic achievement and attitudes toward engineering economy for undergraduate students. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 8(1), 1-11.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296057736
Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2014). Eight important things to know about the experiential learning cycle. Australian Educational Leader, 40(3), 8-14. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Kolb-2/publication/
Lau, W., & Yuen, A. (2010). Promoting conceptual change of learning sorting algorithm through the diagnosis of mental models: the effects of gender and learning styles. Computer & Education, 54(1), 275-288. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/
Liu, G., Huang, S., & Du, Y. (2014). An improved k-means algorithm based on association rules. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 6(2), 146-149. http://www.ijcte.org/papers/853-IT143.pdf
Machado, M., Moreira, T., Gomes, L., Caldeira, A., & Santos, D. (2016). A fuzzy logic application in virtual education. Procedia computer science, 19, 19-26. https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/676534/viewer
Msigwa, O. (2022). Data science machine learning (part 08): k-means clustering in plain mql5. https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/11615
Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in computer and education. Computer & Education, 122, 136-141. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
Sabine, G. (2007). In-depth analysis of the felder-silverman learning style dimensions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 79-93.https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782498
Sangvigit, P., Mungsing, S., & Theeraroungchaisri, A. (2012). Correlation of honey & mumford learning styles and online machine preference. International Journal for Computer Technology and Applications, 3(3), 1-8.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.442.4639&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Svinicki, Manilla D, and Dixon, Nancy M.,(2010). The kolb model modified for classroom activities. College Teaching, 35(4), 141-146.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254338739
Velmurugan, T. (2014). Performance based analysis between k-means and fuzzy c-means clustering algorithms for connection oriented telecommunication data. Applied Soft Computing, 19, 134-146.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568494614000805
Wambsganss, T., Niklaus, C., Cetto, M., Sollner, M., Handschuh, S., & Leimeister, J. (2020). AL:an adaptive learning support system for argumentation skills. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Hawaii, 1-14,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338951985
Wihanto, W., & Survani, E. (2020). Comparison of clustering algorithms: k-means and fuzzy c-means for segmetation retinal blood vessels. Journal of Academy of Medical Sciences, 28(1), 42-47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339440824
Xie, W. (2019). Trends and development in technology enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: a systematic review of journal publications from 2007 – 2017. Computer & Education, 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599
Xiuchange, H. (2014). An improved k-means clustering algorithm. 2011 IEEE 3rd International conference on communication software and networks China. 6-14.
https://10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6014384
Zynel, C., & Yildiz, F. (2018). Comparison of k-means and fuzzy c-means algorithms on different cluster structures behavior. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 6(3), 13-23.