Keywords:-

Keywords: Survival analysis, pooled logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards model, survival piling, concordance index; Monte Carlo simulation.

Article Content:-

Abstract

The Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model and the exponential Cox model are foundational tools in survival analysis, yet they impose structural assumptions; proportional hazards and constant baseline hazard, respectively that frequently fail in practice. This paper proposes and evaluates pooled logistic regression (PLR) applied to survival-piled (stacked) data as an alternative discrete-time survival estimator. Right-censored survival data are restructured into a long-format person-time binary classification dataset, and three models are compared: the exponential Cox model, the classical semi-parametric CPH model, and PLR. Monte Carlo simulations with 1,000 replications at each of six sample sizes (n = 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250) are conducted to assess stability, discrimination, and goodness-of-fit. Performance is measured by Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Simulation results show that PLR maintains consistently high and stable C-index values (0.742–0.784) across all sample sizes, whereas the CPH model exhibits high variability (0.575–0.884) and the exponential Cox model underperforms throughout (0.532–0.671). AIC comparisons further demonstrate PLR's competitive goodness-of-fit at moderate and large sample sizes. Real-data validation using the NCCTG lung cancer dataset corroborates these findings. PLR's theoretical connection to the Cox partial likelihood is established formally, and its compatibility with machine-learning classification pipelines is discussed. The findings support PLR as a robust, flexible, and interpretable alternative for discrete-time survival analysis.

References:-

References

Klein JP, Goel PK (1992) Survival analysis: state of the art. Kluwer Academic, Boston

Cleves MA et al. (2008) An empirical basis for standardizing adherence measures derived from administrative claims data among diabetic patients. Med Care 46:1125–1133

Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 34(2):187–220

Cox DR (1975) Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62(2):269–276

Efron B (1977) The efficiency of Cox's likelihood function for censored data. J Am Stat Assoc 72:557–565

Hess KR (1995) Graphical methods for assessing violations of the proportional hazards assumption in Cox regression. Stat Med 14(15):1707–1723

Pourhoseingholi MA et al. (2007) Comparing Cox regression and parametric models for survival of patients with gastric carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 8(3):412–416

Ramin R et al. (2011) Comparison of the results of Cox proportional hazards model and parametric models in the study of length of stay in a tertiary teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran. Acta Med Iran 49(10):650–658

Luck M et al. (2017) Deep learning for patient-specific kidney graft survival analysis. arXiv:1705.10245

Alonso E et al. (2024) Survival stacking ensemble model for lung cancer risk prediction. Stud Health Technol Inform 321:155–159

D'Agostino RB et al. (1990) Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: The Framingham Heart Study. Stat Med 9(12):1501–1515

Andrew W, John C, Kyle R (2013) Combining parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric survival models with stacked survival models. Biostatistics 16(3):537–549

James HM et al. (2022) Stacked survival models for residual lifetime data. BMC Med Res Methodol 22(10):1–10

Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M (2005) Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Stat Med 24(11):1713–1723

Hosseini M et al. (2007) Comparison of survival models in studying breastfeeding duration. Hakim Health Syst Res J 10(1):66–71

Cox C et al. (2007) Parametric survival analysis and taxonomy of hazard functions for the generalized gamma distribution. Stat Med 26(23):4352–4374

Ginestet PG, Gabriel EE, Sachs MC (2022) Survival stacking with multiple data types using pseudo-observation-based AUC loss. J Biopharm Stat 32(6):858–870

Baek E-T et al. (2021) Survival time prediction by integrating Cox proportional hazards network and distribution function network. BMC Bioinformatics 22(1):192–206

Karthik D, Nader E (2011) A semi-parametric generalization of the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(1):667–676

Wegbom AI, Victor AK, Isaac DE (2019) Comparison between semi-parametric Cox and parametric survival models in estimating the determinants of under-five mortality in Nigeria. Afr J Math Stat Stud 2(2):1–12

Collett D (2003) Modelling survival data in medical research, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

Bland JM, Altman DG (2004) The logrank test. BMJ 328(7447):1073

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

R Core Team (2023) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

Downloads

Citation Tools

How to Cite
Ibeakuzie, P. (2026). Efficiency of the Pooled Logistic Regression Approach as an Alternative to the Cox Proportional Hazard Model. International Journal Of Mathematics And Computer Research, 14(10), 6927-6938. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmcr/v14i10.06