Keywords:-
Article Content:-
Abstract
This article discusses dynamic comparison of variations of Newton’s methods with different types of means for solving nonlinear equations. There are two factors that are considered to affect the shape of the basin of attraction of a method namely the size of the determined convergence area and number of partitions. The computation results of some functions show that harmonic mean Newton’s method (HMN) has small divergence area. On the other hand, contra harmonic mean Newton’s method (CMN) has the largest divergence area and is considered to be the least effective method
References:-
References
Argyros, I. K., & Chen, D. (1993). Results on the Chebyshev method in Banach spaces. Proyecciones (Antofagasta, On line), 12(2), 119-128.
Atkinson, K. E., & Han, W. (2008). An introduction to numerical analysis. John Wiley & sons.
Cayley, P. (1879). Desiderata and suggestions: no. 3. The Newton-Fourier imaginary problem. American Journal of Mathematics, 2(1), 97-97.
Chun, C., & Neta, B. (2015). Basins of attraction for several third order methods to find multiple roots of nonlinear equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 268, 129-137.
Cordero, A., Soleymani, F., Torregrosa, J. R., & Shateyi, S. (2014). Basins of attraction for various Steffensen-type methods. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014.
Geum, Y. H. (2016). Basins of attraction for optimal third order methods for multiple roots. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 10(12), 583-590.
Halley, E. (1964). A new exact and easy method of finding the roots of equations generally and that without any previous reduction, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 18, 136–148.
M, Imran. (2008). Newton Iteration Based on Heronian Mean, Proceedings of the 4th IMT-GT ICMSA, vol. 2, 151-156.
Jamaludin, N. A. A., Nik Long, N. M. A., Salimi, M., & Sharifi, S. (2019). Review of some iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations with multiple zeros. Afrika Matematika, 30(3), 355-369.
Neta, B., Scott, M., & Chun, C. (2012). Basins of attraction for several methods to find simple roots of nonlinear equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(21), 10548-10556.
Ababneh, O. Y. (2012). New Newton’s method with third-order convergence for solving nonlinear equations. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 61(198), 1071-1073.
Özban, A. Y. (2004). Some new variants of Newton's method. Applied Mathematics Letters, 17(6), 677-682.
Said Solaiman, O., & Hashim, I. (2019). Efficacy of optimal methods for nonlinear equations with chemical engineering applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019.
Scott, M., Neta, B., & Chun, C. (2011). Basin attractors for various methods. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(6), 2584-2599.
Stewart, B. D. (2001). Attractor basins of various root-finding methods. Naval Postgraduate School Monterey CA.
Syamsudhuha, Muhammad & M., Imran. (2008). Root mean square newton methods, Proceedings of 5th-Joint seminar UNRI-UKM, vol. 1. pp. 457-461.
Lukić, T., & Ralević, N. M. (2008). Geometric mean Newton’s method for simple and multiple roots. Applied Mathematics Letters, 21(1), 30-36.
Weerakoon, S., & Fernando, T. (2000). A variant of Newton's method with accelerated third-order convergence. Applied Mathematics Letters, 13(8), 87-93.
Zotos, E. E., Suraj, M. S., Mittal, A., & Aggarwal, R. (2018). Comparing the geometry of the basins of attraction, the speed and the efficiency of several numerical methods. International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 4(4), 1-18.