Keywords:-

Keywords: Computer assisted, Discovery, Direct Instruction, Mathematics Performance

Article Content:-

Abstract

In the current educational context, the low academic performance of students in mathematics indicates the need for the implementation of more effective teaching methods to support the understanding of complex concepts. The effectiveness of learning can be enhanced through computer-assisted instruction, particularly in discovery learning (DL-CA) and direct instruction (DI-CA) utilizing web-based media. This study employs a quantitative approach with statistical analysis to examine the significant impact of these teaching methods on students' mathematical performance. Discovery learning and direct instruction were applied to two groups studying numerical methods, focusing on the topic of nonlinear equation solutions using the bisection method, with each group consisting of 33 students. The statistical test results indicated that there was no significant difference in mathematical performance between the DL-CA and DI-CA groups; both methods showed comparable effectiveness. However, both methods had a significant effect on the N-Gain of the learning outcomes in both groups. The improvement in mathematical performance for the DL-CA group was better than that for the DI-CA group, with more students showing high improvement (11 students) compared to the DI-CA group (1 student). Additionally, in the low improvement category, the DL-CA group had fewer students (2 students) than the DI-CA group (8 students). This suggests that both discovery learning and direct instruction have almost equivalent reliability in achieving students' mathematical abilities, but DL-CA is more effective in enhancing performance compared to DI-CA.

References:-

References

Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The Effects of Classroom Mathematics Teaching on Students’ Learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 371-404). Information Age Publishing.

Rosenshine, B. (1986). Synthesis of Research on Explicit Teaching. Educational Leadership, 43(7), 60-69.

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505824.pdf. doi.org/10.1037/e556412012-001

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longmans.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policies and Practices, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Sutrisno, A. (2015). The Influence of Discovery Learning on Learning Outcomes of Mathematics in Elementary School. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(4), 87-92.

https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/V6I4-10

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The Act of Discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.

https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.31.1.3k3j158423k46058

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should There Be a Three Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14

Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300537

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achieving Transfer in Problem-Based Learning Environments. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Bolarinwa, O. A. (2019). How to assess the validity and reliability of a questionnaire. Health Policy and Planning, 34(6), 233-235.

https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz045

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2019). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 10, 53-55.

https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5c2a.3f57

Yu, S., & Yang, Y. (2018). The impact of computer-assisted discovery learning on mathematical problem-solving skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(4), 541-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117731030

Smith, M., & Jones, B. (2017). The effects of discovery learning on students’ mathematics performance. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(1), 29-42.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0201-1

Al-Dwairy, S. S., & Al-Jabri, M. A. (2015). The effect of computer-assisted discovery learning on students' performance in mathematics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 10(4), 10-15.

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i4.4472

Cheng, B., & Hwang, W.-Y. (2017). A conceptual framework for the implementation of mobile learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 160-170.

Ardiwinata, D., & Mudiasih, R. (2018). The effect of computer-assisted discovery learning on students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(4), 134-140.

Warsono, B., & Candra, Y. (2014). The effectiveness of computer-assisted direct instruction in improving students’ mathematics skills. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(1), 30-36.

https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.31079

Arends, R. I. (2007). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill.

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education.

Hutagalung, M. (2021). The impact of direct instruction on students' mathematics learning outcomes. Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 12-21.

https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.14.1.2021.12-21

Septianingsih, D., & Fitriana, R. (2021). The effectiveness of direct instruction on students’ mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14112a

Shapiro, M. J. (2000). A constructivist approach to teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(4), 463-478.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00007-3

Van Hecke, M., & Walberg, H. J. (2009). Effects of direct instruction on students' mathematics achievement. International Review of Education, 55(5), 679-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-009-9174-y

Supriyadi, M., Sholehudin, Sri Rahayu, & Wartono. (2018). Enhancing students' mathematical reasoning abilities through discovery learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11211a

Downloads

Citation Tools

How to Cite
Siregar, G., ., W., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2024). Empowering Discovery Learning and Direct Instruction with Computer-Assisted to Enhance Mathematical Performance. International Journal Of Mathematics And Computer Research, 12(10), 4536-4543. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmcr/v12i10.11